International Paper

Interesų grupė

Kategorija
Būstinė
Registruota
Deklaruotos metinės išlaidos
(pačios deklaruota)
Skaidrumo registras
47376536890-44
Susitikimai su EK
Pateiktos pozicijos
Pozicijos dokumentai
0
Paminėjimai spaudoje
Sumą deklaruoja pati organizacija Skaidrumo registre; institucijos jos netikrina.

Susitikimai pagal metus

20251

Šaltinis: Europos Komisijos skelbiami susitikimai, sutapatinti pagal skaidrumo registro numerį. n = 1 susitikimų; x — metai pagal susitikimo datą, y — susitikimų skaičius.

Susitikimai su Europos Komisija

Skelbiami tik susitikimai su Komisijos nariais, jų kabinetais ir generaliniais direktoriais. Susitikimai žemesniu lygiu ir daugelis kontaktų Parlamente bei Taryboje į registrą nepatenka.
DataPriėmėTema
2025-04-29Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEsChallenges and opportunities for cardboard producers in the EU

Ką pateikė viešoms konsultacijoms

2023-04-21 · Review of the requirements for packaging and feasibility of measures to prevent packaging waste ↗ originalus šaltinis
The virtues and value of corrugated cardboard packaging in two key statements EU corrugated leads the world in all-round performance. Fully recyclable and massively recycled in the EU today, corrugated packaging made from renewable resources is safe and sustainable, fit-for-purpose and already delivers the circular economy, notably (but not only) in the food chain, where it helps avoid food waste because of its superb protective qualities. Corrugated is the most effectively recycled material in Europe. Having fulfilled its initial purposes, 82% of corrugated is collected/recycled so that the fibers can be reused to make new boxes, thereby reducing consumption of virgin materials. EU…

Ką rašo savo pozicijos dokumentuose

Ištraukos iš organizacijos pačios įkeltų dokumentų, be trumpinimų ir perpasakojimų.
Review of the requirements for packaging and feasibility of measures to prevent packaging waste · 3 p.

____________________________ About Fibre Packaging Europe Fibre Packaging Europe is an informal coalition of seven trade associations representing industries involved in forestry, pulp, paper, board and carton production and recycling from across Europe. Our joint mission is to provide renewable, circular and sustainable fibre-based packaging solutions to European citizens to achieve the European Green Deal objectives.

…sustainable fibre-based packaging solutions to European citizens to achieve the European Green Deal objectives. For more information, please contact [email protected] CEPI ECMA EPPA FEFCO PRO CARTON CEPI EUROKRAFT Alliance for Beverage Cartons and the Environment Position of Fibre Packaging Europe on the proposal for a Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation (PPWR) Fibre Packaging Europe (FPE) is an informal coalition of seven trade associations representing industries involved in forestry, pulp, cardboard (paper, board and carton packaging) production and recycling in Europe, coming together to speak with one voice on the policy issues central to the fibre-packaging value chain in the EU.

…coming together to speak with one voice on the policy issues central to the fibre-packaging value chain in the EU. The fibre-based packaging sector acknowledges the European Commission’s proposal for a Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation, and looks forward to supporting an evidence-based regulatory approach during the next stages of the legislative process. Both recyclable and reusable items have a role in the transition to a circular economy. Fibre-based recyclable packaging is produced from low-carbon renewable materials sourced from sustainably managed European forests and recycled at end-of-life.

…from low-carbon renewable materials sourced from sustainably managed European forests and recycled at end-of-life. Thanks to sustainable forest management, Europe can proudly claim that it currently has more forest resources than it did a century ago, with the forest area in Europe growing by 19.3 million hectares over the last 30 years.1 In fact, it is estimated that forests and the forest-based sector absorb around 20% of the EU’s total greenhouse gas emissions per year, contributing to the EU’s climate goals.2 Moreover, fibre-based packaging has a high recycling rate (81.6%)3 and is consequently already a key contributor to the circular economy.

…packaging has a high recycling rate (81.6%)3 and is consequently already a key contributor to the circular economy. 1) The industry should be involved in the drafting of the Design for Recycling Guidelines (DfR) in a systematic and transparent way through CEN FPE welcomes the proposed, actionable and forward-looking, definition of recyclability applicable to all packaging. However, the recyclability of the packaging must be assessed while taking into account material specificities via Design for Recycling (DfR) guidelines which provide technically sound guidance for recycling. The DfR should be based on expert judgment and consultation with targeted stakeholders, including recyclers, waste management operators, and technology providers.

…and consultation with targeted stakeholders, including recyclers, waste management operators, and technology providers. Thus, policymakers should ensure that stakeholders from the industry are consulted in a transparent and systemic manner in the drafting process of DfR guidelines. The paper and board recycling, manufacturing and converting industry, which has already invested into and developed recyclability guidelines4, has the knowledge and the expertise to support the development of DfR guidelines which will ensure recyclability by considering the packaging composition, functionality and suitability for recycling in existing streams and with existing technologies.

…packaging composition, functionality and suitability for recycling in existing streams and with existing technologies. A process within the independent standardisation body, European Committee for Standardisation (CEN), would allow for open cooperation and exchange of expertise to set ambitious and realistic requirements on packaging recyclability. 2) A mandatory 90% collection target for all packaging formats by 2030 is necessary to reach the recycled at scale obligation in 2035, further increase recycling rates and enhance the quality of the secondary raw materials The industry needs enabling conditions to ensure that packaging is recycled at scale by 2035. The first step to recycling is collection. It would be unjustified to ban packaging, as provided for in Art.

…by 2035. The first step to recycling is collection. It would be unjustified to ban packaging, as provided for in Art. 6 (2) (e) of the PPWR, if not recycled at scale in 2035 while the responsibility for collection does not rest with the industry. Such an obligation will penalise the industry, 1 The State of Europe's Forests, Forest Europe (2020) 2 Climate effects of the forest-based sector in the European Union, Peter Holmgren, FutureVistas AB (2020) 3 Recycling rate of packaging waste by type of packaging, EU27, 4 Paper-Based Packaging Recyclability Guidelines (Cepi, CITPA, ACE, FEFCO, 2019); Circularity by Design Guideline for Fibre-Based Packaging (4evergreen.eu, 2022) , FEFCO-Recyclability-Guidelines Final.pdf Ref. Ares(2023)2840940 - 21/04/2023 which has no control over the waste collection schemes available in each Member State.

Ares(2023)2840940 - 21/04/2023 which has no control over the waste collection schemes available in each Member State. Therefore, FPE calls for setting a mandatory 90% collection target for all packaging formats by 2030. EU-wide minimum requirements and a target for separate waste collection at 90% are necessary to further increase recycling and enhance the quality of the secondary raw materials. To achieve this, separate collection must be easy for consumers. From an operational point of view, FPE supports the principle that waste collection should rely on locally fit and efficient methodologies (e.g., kerbside collection rounds from households and businesses, acceptance in waste centres, etc.). In light of the above, used fibre-based packaging could be collected either in a single paper and board packaging stream or in a paper stream including graphic paper.

…could be collected either in a single paper and board packaging stream or in a paper stream including graphic paper. Beverage cartons could be collected in a separate lightweight stream or as part of a deposit refund system (where this would help reach high collection targets). human health and liability possible implications. 3) Recycling and reuse are complementary to create a circular economy. Policy decisions (including reuse targets) should be evidence-based. 4) FPE recognises that recyclable and reusable options are complementary towards a common goal of achieving a circular economy in the EU. Policy decisions (including reuse targets) should be founded on an evidence-based evaluation of the life- cycle impact of packaging, and its system, accompanied by the evaluation of the economic and technological implications, and consequences for human health and food security.

…by the evaluation of the economic and technological implications, and consequences for human health and food security. Importantly, fibre-based packaging has a critical function in protecting and preserving goods throughout the value chain, extending food lifespan5, and preventing product and food waste6 which contributes to resource efficiency7. Crucially, it safeguards consumer safety in logistics and on the shelf. In addition, it provides nutritional information and tells consumers how to store and prepare food safely. Paper-based products, particularly, contribute to expanding the shelf-life period of products often from hours to many days. 8Furthermore, packaging maintains the quality of sensitive products, such as milk and juices, which provide consumers with essential vitamins and nutrients.

…quality of sensitive products, such as milk and juices, which provide consumers with essential vitamins and nutrients. In some sectors (e.g., in food service systems or logistic systems) recyclable fibre packaging has a better environmental performance than reusable options9. As an example, according to the results of an in-depth and certified LCA study10 conducted by Ramboll, the reusable system in quick service restaurants generates 2.8 times more CO2-equivalent emissions, leads to 3.4 times more fossil resource depletion, consumes 3.4 times more freshwater and generates 2.2 times more fine particles compared to the fibre-based single-use system, thus, further accelerates climate change.

19 → 12

originalus šaltinis (PDF) ↗